top of page

About the BFCC-AIRR

The Beneficiary and Family Centered Care Audit and Inter-Rater Reliability Review (BFCC-AIRR) provides expert healthcare quality improvement (QI) services for Inter-Rater Reliability (IRR) of beneficiary-requested appeals and claims review to support the BFCC provisions of the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) Program.

 

The work of the BFCC-AIRR aligns with and supports the CMS National Quality Strategy to advance toward a more equitable, safe, and outcomes-based healthcare system for all individuals, and is part of CMS’ overall strategy to evaluate programs in the 13th Scope of Work by providing better linkages between the BFCC-QIO and the QIN-QIO activities. (Figure 1).

Picture2.png

Specifically, the BFCC-AIRR:

​​

 

  • Supports measurable improvements in the quality of health care for Medicare beneficiaries.

  • Supports an effective and impactful evaluation by ensuring that there is accuracy and consistency in beneficiary appeals and claims review disposition decisions by the BFCC QIN-QIOs. A direct impact on ensuring high-quality care.

  • Enhances patient safety through medical record reviews for preventable patient safety events and the quality of care provided.

  • Supports an overall strategy for data-driven learning healthcare system for quality improvement.

  • Safety valve to ensure that Medicare beneficiaries can exercise their right to high-quality healthcare

 

 

The BFCC-AIRR also supports CMS’ overall evaluation of the QIO program’s performance by providing valid data to assess the impact of BFCC-QIO review activities on ROI and quality.

 

Inter-Rater Reliability Reviews

​

Inter-rater reliability (IRR) refers to the reproducibility or consistency of decisions between two reviewers. The goal of IRR reviews is to ensure consistency in decision-making between the QIOs and the BFCC-AIRR, thus improving consistency in beneficiary appeals and claims review disposition decisions leading to improved quality of healthcare for Medicare beneficiaries. The BFCC-AIRR conducts 2,500 IRR reviews annually for each of the following appeal types:

 

  • Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) Post-Acute Appeals (formerly referred to as BIPA Appeals)

  • Medicare Advantage (MA) Post-Acute Appeals (formerly referred to as Grijalva Appeals)

  • Hospital Discharge Appeals (formerly referred to as Weichardt Appeals)

 

The BFCC-AIRR also performs 2,500 annual reviews of Part A Short Stay claims.

 

If the BFCC-AIRR disagrees with QIO’s review decision, these findings are sent to the BFCC-QIO. The BFCC-QIO will review the AIRR’s findings and can initiate the rebuttal process (Figure 2 below) if they disagree with the IRR findings. CMS may convene discussion sessions between the BFCC-AIRR and BFCC-QIO(s) in non-concurrent cases to promote collaboration, communication, and consistency across case and claims reviews. If there is still a disagreement after both parties have met and discussed the reviews, CMS will determine the disposition of deadlocked cases.   

 

​

Figure 2.  AIRR Rebuttal Process

AIRR Non-concurrent Timeline

To promote better linkages between the BFCC-QIO and the QIN-QIO program activities, data and key findings generated from the BFCC-QIO / AIRR IRR process will be shared with other CMS 13th SOW support contractors such as the Program Monitoring and Evaluation Contractor (PMEC) or National Learning Center Contractor (NLCC).

bottom of page